Clinical Study

Complete Resolution Of Subjective And Objective Findings With Chiropractic Care And IDD Therapy In A Patient With Disc Extrusion And Radiculuar Symptoms

National Libary of Medicine 2025

Case Affiliation: SUNY at Buffalo

Author: Jeffrey S Garofalo

Contributors: Mark Studin DC, Randall Loftus MD, John Strom DC, Geoffrey Gerow DC

History

A 37-year-old female presented to the clinic two weeks after she had injured her back. The patient was lifting a door and felt a pain in her lower back and then Immediately felt sharp pain down her left leg from her lower mid back to the bottom outside of her left foot. The patient reported that she felt numbness under the ball of her left foot and outside pinky toe. The patient denied any bladder or bowel problems and stated that she felt no pain, numbness, or tingling down her right leg. The patient stated that the pain was so bad that they were taking 6-8 Ibuprofen every hour to help with the pain and that she had not slept for any length of time in the last 2 weeks. The patient stated they had never experienced pain like this in the past.

SYSTEMS REVIEW

The patient reports a complaint with the following musculoskeletal system, the presenting complaints, the patient denies any other challenges. The patient reports no other no complaints with the following systems, neurological, head, nose and throat, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, endocrine, and dermatological.

PAST HEALTH HITSTORY

The patient reports an allergy sensitivity to sulfa based medications, and a breast augmentation 4/2011. The patient reports to taking the following medications: pain meds, none other reported. The patient reports the suffering from frequent neck pain, frequent lower back pain, and frequent headaches. The patient reports no accidents.

FAMILY AND SOCIAL HISTORY

The patient reports nothing in her family history, working in an RV factory lifting, bending, twisting and doing laborious work. The patient denies smoking, drinking, or recreational drug use. The patient reports to walking several times per week, and to eating 3 meals per day.
History

Exam

A 37-year-old female presented with a height of 64 inches, a weight of 110 lbs. She had a pulse of 68bpm, blood pressure of128/80 mm/Hg measured using her right arm. The patientโ€™s gait was poor as the patient could only walk a few steps the needed to sit because of pain. The patientโ€™s postural analysis revealed forward head posture present, with the patient being antalgic to the right.
Palpatory Evaluation

Severe muscle spasms in the patientโ€™s erector spinae from lumbar spine to the thoracic spine bilateral were palpated and recorded. The patientโ€™s left piriformis and semitendinosus were in severe spasm. There was hypomobility noted from L1-Sacral base.

Orthopedic Evaluation

The following orthopedic tests were performed: Straight leg raise was positive with the patient indicating an 8 out of 10 (10 being the most severe) pain down her left leg on a verbal pain scale when the left leg was raised to 45 degrees. Raising the left leg also increased the patientโ€™s numbness to the outside of her foot at 45 degrees. Braggards Sign was positive as it increased the patientโ€™s pain down her left leg to an 8 out of 10 (10 being the most severe) on a verbal pain scale.

NEUROLOGICAL EXAM

The following reflexes were tested patellar and ankle and were noted to be normal. Babinski was negative. The following muscle testing of the lower extremity was performed: Hip flexion(L2), Knee extension(L3), Ankle dorsiflexion(L4), Big toe extension(L5) was equal and within normal limits 5/5. Left foot plantarflexion resistance was graded a 3/5 compared to the right and the patient could not stand on her toes as her left plantarflexion muscles were too weak to hold her left heel off the ground. The following sensory test of the lower extremity revealed loss of sensation on her outside left calf S1 dermatome compared to her right. All other L1-L5 dermatomes were within normal limits. Radiographs of the lumbar spine revealed a loss of disc height between L4-L5 on the lateral view and a left leaning lumbar spine on the A to P view. Otherwise, normal alignment. No signs of fractures or tumors. The plan was to order a lumbar MRI due to the loss of muscle function and dermatomal abnormality at the left S1 nerve. The patient was told to ice at home in the lower back for 15-20 minutes every hour until the MRI was performed and further results were received. The MRI was to be obtained the same day, and patient was scheduled to return the following day for her results.

Findings

MRI of the Lumbar Spine (1Day post Initial Exam)
MRI of the lumbar spine shows evidence of a left paracentral disc extrusion type herniation with a caudal migration at the L5-S1 disc level [1]. The disc material appears to efface the left ventral aspect of the thecal sac and causes displacement of the left S1 nerve root. There is no osteophyte formation present which would be consistent within the patientโ€™s injury time frame explained via Wolffโ€™s law [2]. A high signal is noted coming from the central nucleus pulposus out into the outer layers of the posterior annulus fibrosis or herniation, which indicates a newer injury [3].

Differential Diagnosis

Initial Diagnosis
Lumbar radiculitis, Lumbar Sprain Strain.

Updated Diagnosis:

Extruded type disc herniation, Lumbar radiculopathy, Lumbar Strain/Sprain.

Case Diagnosis

COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE FINDINGS WITH CHIROPRACTIC CARE AND IDD THERAPY IN A PATIENT WITH DISC EXTRUSION AND RADICULUAR SYMPTOMS

Diagnosis By

History, Physical Exam, Radiography, MRI
Treatment & Follow Up
Do to a lack of bowel and bladder challenges chiropractic care was started with the following care plan advised: non-surgical spinal decompression with the Accu-Spina IDD Therapy table was recommended and started with the patient (2). The patient would be seen 3 times per week for 40 decompression therapy sessions followed by 10 minutes of ice to decrease inflammation, followed by a chiropractic adjustment (3)

Discussion

The patient is a 37-year-old female who presented with severe lower back pain with radiation and weakness in her left leg and foot after lifting a door 2 weeks ago. Her pain has increased with walking and working, which is preventing her from performing her daily activities. Left S1 dermatome was abnormal for sensation, and her left S1 myotome was weak upon testing. This resulted in immediate referral for a lumbar MRI. In the absence if cauda equina symptoms the patient was not referred for a neurosurgical consult. Straight Leg Raise Test [4] and Braggards Test were bot positive. X-Rays revealed loss of disc space between the L5-S1 vertebra, and hypolordosis. Spinal decompression was recommended and started with the patient [5]. The patient would be seen 3 times per week for 40 decompression therapy sessions followed by 10 minutes of ice to decrease inflammation, followed by a chiropractic adjustment [6]. Chiropractic has been shown to be an effective conservative option for lumbar disc injuries [7]. Chiropractic has been shown to be a safe conservative option for lumbar disc injuries [8]. The patient progressed through care and had complete resolution of all subjective and objective findings. Due to the patientโ€™s subjective and objective findings an MRI was appropriately ordered to determine the cause of the patientโ€™s findings and to rule in or out a disc herniation, bulge or some other space occupying lesion that was present [9]. Seeing the imaging helped create a proper diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan that resulted in a complete resolution in subjective and objective findings. The patient had a 0 out of 10 on a verbal pain scale both for lower back pain and leg pain. Straight Leg Test and Braggardโ€™s Test were now negative for symptoms. The patient was able to get back to walking, exercising and working without pain present at all.

Citations:

[1] Fardon, D. F., Williams, A. L., Dohring, E. J., Murtagh, F. R., Rothman, S. L. G., & Sze, G. K. (2014). Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology. The Spine Journal, 14(11), 2525-2545

[2] He, G., & Xinghua, Z. (2006). The numerical simulation of osteophyte formation on the edge of the vertebral body using quantitative bone remodeling theory. Joint Bone Spine 73(1), 95-101

[3] Konieczny, Markus Rafael, et al. “Signal intensity of lumbar disc herniations: correlation with age of herniation for extrusion, protrusion, and sequestration.” International journal of spine surgery 14.1 (2020): 102-107.

[4] Majlesi, Javid, et al. “The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation.” JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 14.2 (2008): 87-91

[5] Shealy C.M., Borgmeyer V.; Decompression, Reduction and Stabilization of the Lumbar Spineโ€™s A cost effective treatment for lumbosacral pain. AM1 Pain Management 195527263-65

[6] McMorland, G., Suter, E., Casha, S., du Plessis, S. J., & Hurlbert, R. J. (2010). Manipulation or microdiscectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 33 (8), 576-584

[7] Leemann S, Peterson CK, Schmid C, Anklin B, Humphreys BK. Outcomes of acute and chronic patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic lumbar disc herniations receiving high-velocity, low-amplitude, spinal manipulative therapy: a prospective observational cohort study with one-year follow-up. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(3):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

[8] Chu, E.CP., Trager, R.J., Lee, L.YK. et al. A retrospective analysis of the incidence of severe adverse events among recipients of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy. Sci Rep 13, 1254 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28520-4

[9] Wong, K. H., & Yeo, W. (2015). The role of MRI in diagnosing lumbar disc herniation. The Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10(1), 1-8.